Alliance form : a test of the contractual and competence perspectives

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071504829</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418124409.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">040205e20031201gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">922.111</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080240646</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Colombo, Massimo G.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Alliance form</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: a test of the contractual and competence perspectives</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Massimo G. Colombo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This paper analyzes factors that influence firms' choice of the organizational form of strategic alliances. I consider arguments suggested by both the contractual and the competence perspectives. In order to distinguish empirically between them. I devote special attention to the role played by the similarity of partner firms' technological specialization</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080606091</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estrategia empresarial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080599881</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Alianzas estratégicas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600624</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Costes de transacción</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080611897</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Perspectivas económicas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080557591</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Competencia</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080622169</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Responsabilidad contractual</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080547127</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estudios</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077100307</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Strategic management journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Chichester [etc.] : Wiley</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 25, nº 24, December 2003 ; p. 1209-1229</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>