Búsqueda

A model for optimization of biomarker testing frequency to minimize disease and cost : example of beryllium sensitization testing

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Judd, Nancy L.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2003-12-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">A common problem with medical surveillance programs using biomarkers is determining the optimal frequency of testing to minimize adverse health effects and cost. In the case of beryllium-exposed workers, frequency of testing for beryllium sensitization may be especially important. Recent studies indicate a lack of dose response for beryllium sensitization, but do support a dose response for the development of chronic beryllium disease</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/56837.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Contaminantes biológicos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Riesgos biológicos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Enfermedades crónicas</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Berilio</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Medicina laboral</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Factores de riesgo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Aleaciones</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Casos prácticos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Higiene industrial</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">A model for optimization of biomarker testing frequency to minimize disease and cost : example of beryllium sensitization testing</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Risk analysis : an international journal. - New York and London : Society for Risk Analysis. - Vol. 23, nº 6, December, 2003 ; p. 1211-1220</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>