The Asbestos case : a comment on the appointment and use of nonpartisan experts in Word Trade Organization dispute resolution involving health risk

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071505373</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418124619.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">040601e20040401usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">872</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080280062</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Carruth, Russellyn S.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">The Asbestos case</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: a comment on the appointment and use of nonpartisan experts in Word Trade Organization dispute resolution involving health risk</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Russellyn S. Carruth, Bernard D. Goldstein</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The purpose of this article is to examine and critique the Asbestos Case as a model for how World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute-resolution panels obtain impartial scientific imput for their decision processes, particulary concerning health risk. As globalization increases and multinational trade becomes more important to national economics, so does the importance of the WTO as a mechanism for adjudicating trade disputes among its members. The credibility of the WTO dispute-resolution process in cases involving complex scientific issues is dependent upon the Panel's marshaling and applying the best scientific evidence</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080542832</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Amianto</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080619480</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Enfermedades profesionales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080585679</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Higiene industrial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588953</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Análisis de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080283353</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Goldstein, Bernard D.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077000345</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York and London</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 2, April 2004 ; p. 471-481</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>