An Economic analysis of auto compensation system : choice experiences from New Jersey and Pennsylvania
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
---|---|---|---|
LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
001 | MAP20071505393 | ||
003 | MAP | ||
005 | 20080418124625.0 | ||
007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
008 | 040607e20031201usa|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
084 | $a322 | ||
100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080147693$aSchmit, Joan T. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | $aAn Economic analysis of auto compensation system$b: choice experiences from New Jersey and Pennsylvania$cJoan T.Schmit, Jia-Hsing Yeh |
520 | 8 | $aNearly since the first automobile traveled on U.S. soil, questions about how best to compensate people injured by their use have been raised. Despute various efforts to identify and implement improved systems during the past more the 70 years, no clear best compensation mechanism has been found. Current discussions has focused on the "choice" system, under which insureds are allowed to select either a tort system or a no-fault system of compensantion at the time of insurance purchase. New Jersey and Pennsylvania, which implemented very similar choice programs in 1989 and 1990, respectvely, offer an opportunity to observe the effects of choice on outcomes such as: use of attorneys , speed of payment, and consistency (equity) of payment | |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080603779$aSeguro de automóviles |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080572396$aIndemnizaciones |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080547127$aEstudios |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080568863$aEstados Unidos |
650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080583538$aAnálisis económico |
700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080120191$aYeh, Jia-Hsing | |
740 | 4 | $aThe Journal of risk and insurance | |
773 | 0 | $wMAP20077000727$tThe Journal of risk and insurance$dOrlando$gVolume 70, number 4, December 2003 ; p. 601-628 |