Managing off-the-job injuries : communication the key to putting workers back on line

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071506052</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418124928.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">041110e20041001usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">870</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080099206</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gaspers, Karen</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Managing off-the-job injuries</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: communication the key to putting workers back on line</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Karen Gaspers</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Although employers often believe they are hindered in facilitating return to work after an off-the-job injury or illness, in reality they have more options than they realize. Instead, companies need to step up and take control of the situation by establishing return-to-work criteria for different positions within the company, as well as the specific circumstances under which workers may return </subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080564445</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajadores</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080546991</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Empresas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080599744</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Accidentes de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080595692</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Coste del absentismo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080562236</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Enfermedades</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080583293</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Absentismo laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Safety & health</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Safety & health</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Itasca</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 4, October 2004 ; p. 32-35</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>