Búsqueda

Increasing the number of guards at nuclear power plants

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071506205</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418125005.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">041209e20040801usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">80</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080059101</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Westrum, Ron</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Increasing the number of guards at nuclear power plants</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Ron Westrum</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The article is about increasing the guards numbers at nuclear plants. Sheer numbers are not in themselves a strong guarantee. Instead, what clearly needs to be done is to assess the cultures of nuclear installations to find out just how robuts those cultures are. We need to provide support to those plants that exhibit a generative culture, so they can better do their job. As investigations over the last decade have shown, there are a plenty of nuclear installations that are anything but generative. Adding more guards to such plants is not likely to improve much of anything</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080568863</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080549756</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Atentados</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080556808</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Terrorismo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080582524</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad nuclear</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080611187</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Instalaciones nucleares</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602925</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Personal de seguridad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077000345</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York and London</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 4, August 2004 ; p. 959-961</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>