Stay or go?
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071507448 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418125519.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 051220e20050901gbr|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a815.2 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aStay or go? |
| 520 | 8 | $aA new study suggests that residents near to a chemical fire should stay rather than evacuate. That selthering option is based largely on experimental and modelling studies, rather than on comparative data from actual chemical fires, because there is insufficient data relating to evacuating and sheltering from real incidents | |
| 650 | 0 | 1 | $0MAPA20080577155$aPlantas químicas |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080608057$aProgramas de actuación |
| 650 | 0 | 1 | $0MAPA20080580865$aImpacto ambiental |
| 650 | 0 | 1 | $0MAPA20080554316$aEvacuación |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080597603$aMedios de evacuación |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080620424$aSeguridad contra incendios |
| 740 | 0 | $aFire prevention | |
| 773 | 0 | $wMAP20077000260$tFire prevention$dLondon$gnº 396, September 2005 ; p. 49-51 |