Solvency II and reinsurance : how important is a reinsurers rating?

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: CEIOPS is currently focusing on the development of implementing measures. The standard formula for measuring counterparty default risks is again the subject of debate. Of particular interest is whether rating information is appropriately recognised. Though there is some uncertainty on various aspects, there appears to be no alternative at present. In the coming year, the last quantitative impact study for the time being,  QIS5, will provide companies with the opportunity to measure their counterparty default risks on the basis of the modified and in some areas simplified standard formula</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/124302.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Münchener Rück</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Solvencia II</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Reaseguro</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Supervisión de seguros</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Control de seguros</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Libros</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Solvency II and reinsurance : how important is a reinsurers rating?</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">Solvency Consulting Knowledge Series</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>