Towards a solution to vocabulary problems in computing : a measure of goodness of fit
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20071020604</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20080418120306.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">940720e19880501gbr|||| | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">875</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080169589</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Lindgaard, Gitte</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Towards a solution to vocabulary problems in computing</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: a measure of goodness of fit</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Gitte Lindgaard and Loris Perry</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Three experiments are reported in the following study which explored people's preferences for certain labels in the context of electronic mail and the extent to which such preferences may be indicative of performance using these. The data showed that people clearly preferred generic over technical labels</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080584405</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Correo electrónico</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080564360</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Terminología</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080559281</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Lingüística</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080558888</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Información</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080607289</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Métodos experimentales</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080550233</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Congresos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080053284</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Perry, Loris</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="711" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080487874</subfield>
<subfield code="a">International Ergonomics Association</subfield>
<subfield code="d">1988</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Sydney</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
<subfield code="d">London [etc.]</subfield>
<subfield code="g">Vol. 31, nº 5, May 1988 ; p. 785-801</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>