The Use of protocol analysis for determining ability requirements for personnel selection on a computer-based task
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20071022675</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20080418120737.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">950605e19941101gbr|||| | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">875</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080223229</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Koubek, Richard J.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
<subfield code="a">The Use of protocol analysis for determining ability requirements for personnel selection on a computer-based task</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Richard J. Koubek, Gavriel Salvendy and Soraya Noland</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The role of cognitively oriented tasks in the workplace continues to increase as automation of physical task components advances. Difficulties in automating the operator's cognitive processes have placed a renewed emphasis on the human component in advanced manufacturing systems. While traditional task analysis techniques have made significant contributions to improving productivity when important task elements are visually observable, their focus on manual task procedures make them less effective for cognitively oriented activities. This research has made a first attempt at integrating techniques from several disciplines to develop a cognitive task analisis methodology</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080603878</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Selección de personal</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080604035</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Sistemas informáticos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080595036</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Capacidad de trabajo</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591960</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Métodos de análisis</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080550127</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Cognición</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080206178</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Salvendy, Gavriel</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080110277</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Noland, Soraya</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
<subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
<subfield code="g">Vol. 37, nº 11, November 1994 ; p. 1787-1800</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>