Pesquisa de referências

Teams make it work : how team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Universidad de Oviedo. Facultad de Psicología</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Principado de Asturias. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-03-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: In this study we analyze the mediating role of team work engagement between team social resources and team performance as predicted by the Job Demands-Resources Model. Aggregated data of 533 employees nested within 62 teams and 13 organizations were used, whereas team performance was assessed by supervisor ratings. Structural equation modeling revealed that, as expected, team work engagement plays a mediating role between social resources perceived at the team level and team performance as assessed by the supervisor</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/138082.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>spa</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ambiente de trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Trabajo en equipo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Evaluación del desempeño</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Psicosociología</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos de análisis</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Teams make it work : how team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Revista Psicothema .- Oviedo : Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo : Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. - Vol. 24, nº 1, 2012 ; p. 106-112</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>