The Value of instructional communication in crisis situations : restoring order to chaos
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20120036680</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20120918101651.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">120816e20120402esp|||p |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">7</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
<subfield code="a">The Value of instructional communication in crisis situations</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: restoring order to chaos</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Timothy L. Sellnow...[et.al]</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">This article explores the nature of instructional communication in responding to crisis situations. Through the lens of chaos theory, the relevance of instructional messages in restoring order is established. This perspective is further advanced through an explanation of how various learning styles impact the receptivity of various instructional messages during the acute phase of crises. We then summarize an exploratory study focusing on the relationship between learning styles and the demands of instructional messages in crisis situations. We conclude the article with a series of conclusions and implications.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080580698</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Gestión de crisis</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20120006850</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Comunicación social</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080609788</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Comunicación del riesgo</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080602871</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Percepción del riesgo</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080588953</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Análisis de riesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591960</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Métodos de análisis</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20120022478</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Sellnow, Timothy L.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077000345</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Risk analysis : an international journal</subfield>
<subfield code="d">McLean, Virginia : Society for Risk Analysis, 1987-2015</subfield>
<subfield code="x">0272-4332</subfield>
<subfield code="g">02/04/2012 Volumen 32 Número 4 - abril 2012 , p. 633-643</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>