Accounting for "insurance contracts" according to IASB exposure draft - Is the information useful?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20130015545</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20130521133833.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">130513e20130401esp|||p |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">13</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20130006062</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Nguyen, Tristan</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Accounting for "insurance contracts" according to IASB exposure draft - Is the information useful?</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Tristan Nguyen, Philipp Molinari</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB, former IASC) has been working on a new international standard for insurance contracts based on fair value for about 10 years now. However, details on how to measure such a value in practice were unclear for a long time. A first indication of how an accounting model for insurance liabilities could look like was given by the Discussion Paper from May 2007 and concretised with the publication of the IASB Exposure Draft Insurance Contracts. This paper aims to analyse the extent to which the accounting model for insurance liabilities introduced in the Exposure Draft is qualified to generate useful information to users of financial statements. Furthermore, we give recommendations about which fields need further adjustments in order to comply with decision usefulness as the overriding principle.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080561895</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Contabilidad</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080590567</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Empresas de seguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080584290</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Contrato de seguro</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591830</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Margen de solvencia</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20130006369</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Molinari, Philipp</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080462246</subfield>
<subfield code="a">International Accounting Standards Board</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077100215</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1018-5895</subfield>
<subfield code="g">01/04/2013 Volumen 38 Número 2 - abril 2013 , p. 376-398</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>