Proportionality in the new German Insurance Contract Act 2008
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000cab a22000004b 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20140029884 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20140826152208.0 | ||
| 008 | 140826e2012 nld|| p |0|||b|eng d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa$dMAP | ||
| 084 | $a131.1 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080660932$aHeiss, Helmut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aProportionality in the new German Insurance Contract Act 2008$cHelmut Heiss |
| 520 | $aIn 2008, the German legislature enacted a completely revised Insurance Contract Act, in which a new rule of proportionality replaced the former all-or-nothing principle for questions of liability. This article outlines the reasons of this shift and the impact of the rule of proportionality on insurers and policyholders. It also addresses the criticisms raised regarding the new system as well as some of the technical problems arising in its application, for example with regard to placement of the burden of proof | ||
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080584290$aContrato de seguro | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080584634$aDerecho de seguros | |
| 651 | 1 | $0MAPA20080637996$aAlemania | |
| 773 | 0 | $tErasmus Law Review$gVol. 5, Issue 2, 2012 ; p.105-114 |