Small quakes, big impact : lessons learned from Christchurch
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000cam a22000004b 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20150006943 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20150521112403.0 | ||
| 008 | 150210s2015 che|||| ||| ||eng d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa$dMAP | ||
| 084 | $a328.1 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20120006768$aGrollimund, Balz | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aSmall quakes, big impact$b: lessons learned from Christchurch$cBalz Grollimund |
| 260 | $aZurich$bSwiss Reinsurance Company$ccop. 2014 | ||
| 520 | $aCould a small aftershock in a city not considered an earthquake hotspot trigger one of the largest insurance losses ever? Absolutely, because this is exactly what happened when a 6.3 magnitude earthquake hit Christchurch, New Zealand, on 22 February 2011. The massive and unexpected insurance costs exposed blind spots in current views of financial earthquake risk. And, in the aftermath of the event, both the claims and rebuilding process proved challenging. Given that a similar sized earthquake can occur virtually anywhere, it is vital that we learn from the Christchurch experience | ||
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080629755$aSeguro de riesgos extraordinarios | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080556792$aTerremotos | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080573706$aRiesgos urbanos | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080606770$aIngeniería urbanística | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080579784$aCostes económicos | |
| 650 | 4 | $0MAPA20080572396$aIndemnizaciones | |
| 651 | 1 | $0MAPA20090005181$aNueva Zelanda | |
| 710 | 2 | $0MAPA20080448349$aSwiss Reinsurance Company |