Small quakes, big impact : lessons learned from Christchurch

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Grollimund, Balz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Swiss Reinsurance Company</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2015</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: Could a small aftershock in a city not considered an earthquake hotspot trigger one of the largest insurance losses ever? Absolutely, because this is exactly what happened when a 6.3 magnitude earthquake hit Christchurch, New Zealand, on 22 February 2011. The massive  and unexpected  insurance costs exposed blind spots in current views of financial earthquake risk. And, in the aftermath of the event, both the claims and rebuilding process proved challenging. Given that a similar sized earthquake can occur virtually anywhere, it is vital that we learn from the Christchurch experience </dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/151255.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Swiss Reinsurance Company</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Seguro de riesgos extraordinarios</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Terremotos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Riesgos urbanos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ingeniería urbanística</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Costes económicos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Indemnizaciones</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Nueva Zelanda</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Livros</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Small quakes, big impact : lessons learned from Christchurch</dc:title>
<dc:coverage xml:lang="es">Nueva Zelanda</dc:coverage>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>