Private equity in India : once overestimated, now underserved
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a22000004b 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20150011336</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20150320122446.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">150320e20150201usa|||p |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">921.4</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20150007858</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Pandit, Vivek</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Private equity in India</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: once overestimated, now underserved</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Vivek Pandit</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">In the early years of this century, private-equity (PE) firms and their investors were enthusiastic about India's potential. Fifty percent of the country's 1.1 billion people were younger than 30. From 2003 to 2007, GDP grew by 7.5 percent annually, 88 million middle-class households were formed (more than twice the number in Brazil), urban dwellers grew by 35 million to 330 million, and 60 percent of the population was in the labor force. Banks' nonperforming-asset ratios fell from 9.5 percent to 2.6 percent. Further, the PE-to-GDP ratio stood at 1.8 percent, reassuring investors that India had plenty of headroom when compared with developed markets such as the United Kingdom (4.2 percent) and the United States (4.4 percent). Private investors poured about $93 billion into India between 2001 and 2013. At first, returns were strong: 25 percent gross returns at exit for investments made from 1998 to 2005, considerably better than the 18 percent average return of public equity</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080597269</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Inversiones privadas</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080595906</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Desarrollo económico</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591922</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mercados emergentes</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080611897</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Perspectivas económicas</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080663636</subfield>
<subfield code="a">India</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080442569</subfield>
<subfield code="a">McKinsey & Company</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="t">The McKinsey Quartely</subfield>
<subfield code="g">February 2015 ; [10] p.</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>