Blockchain in insurance : guiding the hammer toward the real nails
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a22000004b 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20160033533</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20220911192731.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">161111e20161003usa|| p |0 b|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">219</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20160007657</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Fitzgerald, Mike</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Blockchain in insurance</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: guiding the hammer toward the real nails</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Mike Fitzgerald</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Insurers have significant opportunities with a common, secure ledger for business transactions.Blockchain offers an immutable audit trail that promises to reduce costs, collapse time, and increase service. Blockchain is currently in a typical hype cycle that accompanies new, promising technologies. Until it matures, there will be a tendency to use the blockchain hammer for any inconvenient nail in insurance. In fact there are some uses for which it is well suited and others cases in which different automation is the superior choice.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20160009583</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Blockchain</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080609085</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Transferencia de datos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080598631</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Reducción de riesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080586294</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mercado de seguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080631925</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Nuevas tecnologías de la información</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080568641</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Digitalización</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080618667</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Transacciones comerciales</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="t">Property Casualty 360º</subfield>
<subfield code="g">October 3, 2016 ; 5 p. </subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>