Actuaries beware : pricing cyber insurance is a different ballgame
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000nam a22000004b 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20170003069</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20170131094306.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">170131s2017 usa|||| ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">6</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20170001270</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Pyle, Joshua</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Actuaries beware</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: pricing cyber insurance is a different ballgame</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Joshua Pyle</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">Mountain View, CA</subfield>
<subfield code="b">Symantec</subfield>
<subfield code="c">[2017]</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The problem here is obvious: cyber insurance needs to be priced at a low loss ratio due to catastrophic or aggregation risk, and once that wave of profitability ends, it could do so in dramatic fashion that proves devastating for many market participants</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20160007633</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Ciberriesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080564322</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Tarificación</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20090041776</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Análisis actuarial</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080592059</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Modelos predictivos</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>