Longevity risk management and shareholder value for a life annuity business
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20170006664</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20170301142552.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">170301e20170102usa|||p |0|||b|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">6</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Longevity risk management and shareholder value for a life annuity business</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Craig Blackburn... [et al.]</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The life annuity business is heavily exposed to longevity risk. Risk transfer solutions are not yet fully developed, and when available they are expensive. A significant part of the risk must therefore be retained by the life insurer. So far, most of the research work on longevity risk has been mainly concerned with capital requirements and specific risk transfer solutions. However, the impact of longevity risk on shareholder value also deserves attention. While it is commonly accepted that a market-consistent valuation should be performed in this respect, the definition of a fair shareholder value for a life insurance business is not trivial. In this paper, we develop a multi-period market-consistent shareholder value model for a life annuity business. The model allows for systematic and idiosyncratic longevity risk and includes the most significant variables affecting shareholder value: the cost of capital (which in a market-consistent setting must be quantified in terms of frictional and agency costs, net of the value of the limited liability put option), policyholder demand elasticity and the cost of alternative longevity risk management solutions, namely indemnity-based and index-based solutions. We show how the model can be used for assessing the impact of different longevity risk management strategies on life insurer shareholder value and solvency.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20130011554</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Blackburn, Craig</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077000420</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Astin bulletin</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Belgium : ASTIN and AFIR Sections of the International Actuarial Association</subfield>
<subfield code="x">0515-0361</subfield>
<subfield code="g">02/01/2017 Volumen 47 Número 1 - enero 2017 , p. 43-77</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>