2017 Europe, Middle East & Africa cyber risk transfer comparison report

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cam a22000004b 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20170033783</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20171019174206.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">171019s2017    usa||||       ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">7</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">2017 Europe, Middle East & Africa cyber risk transfer comparison report</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Sponsored by Aon Risk Solutions independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">New York [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">AON Risk Solutions</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2017</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The purpose of this research is to compare the relative insurance protection of certain tangible versus intangible assets. How do cyber asset values and potential losses compare to tangible asset values and potential losses from an organisation¿s other perils, such as fireand weather?
Quantitative models are being developed that evaluate the return on investment of various cyber risk management IT security and process solutions, which can incorporate cost-benefit analysis for different levels of insurance. As such, organisations are driven toward a holistic capital expenditure discussion spanning functional teams rather than being segmented in traditional siloes. The goal of these models is to identify and protect critical assets by aligning macro-level risk tolerance more consistently</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20160007633</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ciberriesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080615673</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Transferencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080604370</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Valoración de activos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588823</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Activos intangibles</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20130009186</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gestión de intangibles</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080617141</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Identificación de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602567</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos cuantitativos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20140027149</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">EMEA</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20120012240</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">AON Risk Solutions</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>