Willis Re 1st view : contrasting realities
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cam a22000004b 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20190000802</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20190111141921.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">190109e20190101gbr|||| ||| ||eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">5</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Willis Re 1st view</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: contrasting realities</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Willis Re</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">London</subfield>
<subfield code="a">New York</subfield>
<subfield code="b">Willis Re</subfield>
<subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">January 1, 2019, placements have highlighted the gap between pricing for accounts with peak peril exposures and/or poor loss records, and those with good loss records and/or non-peak exposures. The quality of the client counterparty is a significant factor in risk selection by many reinsurers. Notably, European property catastrophe renewals that benefit both from good loss records and a disciplined early renewal process have been able to achieve some risk-adjusted rate reductions, and similarly in the U.S., reinsurers' support for the preferred clients is evident in relatively muted renewal pricing on non-loss-impacted business. Buyers who delayed their approach to market in the hope of achieving better prices have found that, for the first time in a number of years, this tactic has not been successful. As 2019 pricing unfolds, the mid-year renewals may help to answer the longstanding question over how much impact the retro market has on first-tier reinsurance property catastrophe pricing levels</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080602529</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Mercado de reaseguros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080553043</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Accidentes</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080629755</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Seguro de riesgos extraordinarios</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080600204</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Catástrofes naturales</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080608088</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Programas de reaseguro</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080587260</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Ratios financieros</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080582180</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Ratios de gestión</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080611880</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Perspectivas del seguro</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080556228</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Renovación</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20100001219</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Willis Re</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>