Pesquisa de referências
Centro de Documentação

Choosing ERM techonology and frameworks

 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Choosing ERM techonology and frameworks</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="corporate" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20190001953">
<namePart>Origami Risk</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20190001953</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">usa</placeTerm>
</place>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Chicago, IL</placeTerm>
</place>
<publisher>Origami Risk</publisher>
<dateIssued>2019</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
<extent>16 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">As organizations wrestle with expanding enterprise risk management (ERM) programs, two common areas of focus are selecting a framework and choosing an ERM technology platform. Frequently viewed in combination, these choices are often approached as end goals themselves -implement the framework, roll out the new platform, and then mark the list as complete.
This white paper provides the foundation for an alternative method. Drawing from the experience of ERM experts, spanning years of successful (and less than successful) implementations, we have identified some of the keys that consistently lead to viable, sustainable programs. Framed in the right context, the choices of frameworks and technology become simplified</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">Origami Risk</note>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080591182">
<topic>Gerencia de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080588953">
<topic>Análisis de riesgos</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080536534">
<topic>ERM</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080586546">
<topic>Nuevas tecnologías</topic>
</subject>
<subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080606091">
<topic>Estrategia empresarial</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">7</classification>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">190214</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20190214164053.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20190005128</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>