Choosing ERM techonology and frameworks

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Origami Risk</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2019</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: As organizations wrestle with expanding enterprise risk management (ERM) programs, two common areas of focus are selecting a framework and choosing an ERM technology platform. Frequently viewed in combination, these choices are often approached as end goals themselves -implement the framework, roll out the new platform, and then mark the list as complete.
This white paper provides the foundation for an alternative method. Drawing from the experience of ERM experts, spanning years of successful (and less than successful) implementations, we have identified some of the keys that consistently lead to viable, sustainable programs. Framed in the right context, the choices of frameworks and technology become simplified</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/167036.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Origami Risk</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Gerencia de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">ERM</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Nuevas tecnologías</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Estrategia empresarial</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Livros</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Choosing ERM techonology and frameworks</dc:title>
<dc:format xml:lang="es">16 p.</dc:format>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>