Classification of chest radiografs for pneumoconiosis : a comparison of two methods of reading
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Classification of chest radiografs for pneumoconiosis</title>
<subTitle>: a comparison of two methods of reading</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative">
<title>British journal of industrial medicine</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080051693">
<namePart>Muir, D.C.F.</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20080051693</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">gbr</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">1992</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
<form authority="marccategory">microform</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract displayLabel="Summary">The purpose of the present study was to determinate whether there would be any advantage, in terms of improved reader agreement, in reading and reporting the six lung zones separately rather than integrating all readings to produce a single classification for each film. The possible validity of evaluating the six zones separately was suggested by a previous study of the relation between radiographic appearances and underlying pathology in which a good correlation was found</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">D.C.F. Muir... [et al.]</note>
<subject authority="" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080455859">
<name type="corporate">
<namePart>International Labour Organization</namePart>
</name>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080576615">
<topic>Medicina laboral</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080619480">
<topic>Enfermedades profesionales</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080556075">
<topic>Radiología</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080545192">
<topic>Rayos X</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080566593">
<topic>Neumoconiosis</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">873</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>British journal of industrial medicine</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>London and Margate</publisher>
</originInfo>
<part>
<text>nº 12, December 1992 ; p. 869-871</text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">940203</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20080418114935.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20071017140</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>