A Critique of the internal logic of ICRP risk factor derivation

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071017436</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418115047.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940217s1983    gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800003292</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">872</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080077457</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mathews, J.A.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
      <subfield code="a">A Critique of the internal logic of ICRP risk factor derivation</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">J.A. Mathews</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The conceptual model of radiation protection was revised by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in 1977, and there has followed a far-flung regulatory debate. One of the proposals of the ICRP was to introduce a new system of dose limitation which takes into consideration the risk to all significantly exposed internal organs. This is done using explicit risk factors which summarize the evidence relating to the long-term consequences of radiation exposures. The derivation of these risk factors by ICRP involves a number of assumptions concerning the spread of risk across different sectors of the population; this paper offers a critique of those assumptions</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080471514</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">International Commission on Radiological Protection</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080585679</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Higiene industrial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600488</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Contaminantes físicos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080639532</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Radiaciones</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570484</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Riesgo laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080619480</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Enfermedades profesionales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The Annals of occupational hygiene</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">The Annals of occupational hygiene</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Oxford [etc.]</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 3, 1983 ; p. 291-300</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>