Complexity, fuzziness, and ergonomic incompatibility issues in the control of dynamic work environments

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071019364</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418115800.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940527e19910601gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800013209</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">870</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080246952</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Karwowski, Waldemar</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Complexity, fuzziness, and ergonomic incompatibility issues in the control of dynamic work environments</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Waldemar Karwowski</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This paper explores some of the basic methodological issues related to the foundations of ergonomics as a science. In the first part, the modelling efforts in ergonomics research are reviewed. Next, the issue of fuzziness inherent to all complex human-machine-environement systems is discussed. Finally, the concepts of ergonomic system and its entropy are presented, and the principle of ergonomic incompatibility is formulated. It is postulated that the basic aim of ergonomics is realized through the unique investigative process exploring system's incompatibilities</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080608637</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistema hombre-máquina</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588946</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ambiente de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080566043</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Investigación</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080559595</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Metodología</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 34, nº 6, June 1991 ; p. 671-686</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>