The Effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071019531 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418115832.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 940602e19901201gbr|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 035 | $a6800013266 | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a875 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | $aThe Effect of lifting protocol on comparisons with isoinertial lifting performance$cJ. Stevenson... [et al.] |
| 520 | $aThe purpose of the study was threefold: (1) to determine if protocol constraints affected scores on a box-lifting task; (2) to identify any differences in impact of protocol changes on male and female scores; and (3) to determine if these protocol changes affected correlations between maximal box-lifting scores and maximal scores obtained on isoinertial lifting tests. It was concluded that the Incremental lifting machine (ILM) was unable to predict female lifting capabilities accurately using any of three protocols | ||
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080550653$aErgonomía |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080557348$aBiomecánica |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080572297$aFuerza muscular |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080570873$aTrabajo físico |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080589462$aCarga de materiales |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080539948$aTests |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080552282$aProtocolo |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080551797$aMuestreos |
| 700 | 1 | $0MAPA20080149499$aStevenson, J.M. | |
| 740 | 0 | $aErgonomics | |
| 773 | 0 | $tErgonomics$dLondon and Washington$gVol. 33, nº 12, December 1990 ; p. 1455-1469 |