A Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Nebelsick-Gullett, Lori J.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>1988-10-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between anaerobic work capacity (AWC) and anaerobic capacity (AC) from the Critical Power (CP) and Wingate tests, respectively. A secondary purpose was to determine the reliability of AWC and CP. The results of this study indicated that de CP test was a valid and reliable technique for determining anaerobic capabilities as well as the maximal rate of fatigueless work</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/48309.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Trabajo físico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ejercicio físico</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Capacidad de trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Capacidad anaeróbica</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonometría</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Tests</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">A Comparison between methods of measuring anaerobic work capacity</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Ergonomics</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London [etc.]. - Vol. 31, nº 10, October 1988 ; p. 1413-1419</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>