Stop workers-comp abuse before it begins : how to take charge of suspicious workers-compensation claims

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071024258</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418121041.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">960227e19960201usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">870</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080011987</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Hans, Mick</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Stop workers-comp abuse before it begins</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: how to take charge of suspicious workers-compensation claims</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Mick Hans</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The financial impact of workers-compensation fraud in the United States is difficult to calculate. Employers aren't eager to post loss numbers publicly, nor is the line between pure fraud and lesser forms of abuse well-defined. When someone claims a back injury and is spotted playing softball, it is clearly fraud. On the other hand, is it criminal activity when a clerk with a carpal tunnel problem stays out for an extra couple of days? Most fraud cases fall into this vague "abuse" category</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080583293</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Absentismo laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080541064</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Fraude</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591441</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Incapacidad laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080572396</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Indemnizaciones</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080546991</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Empresas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080579784</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Costes económicos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080568863</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Safety & health</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Safety & health</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Itasca</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 153, nº 2, February 1996 ; p. 34-37</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>