Pesquisa de referências

Task-based contributions to the design and assessment of the man-machine interfaces for a pressurized water reactor

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071024474</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418121116.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">960322e19950301gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080088842</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ainsworth, Les</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Task-based contributions to the design and assessment of the man-machine interfaces for a pressurized water reactor</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Les Ainsworth and Geoff Pendlebury</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The task analysis programme to support the design of the nuclear power station at Sizewell "B" was developed in a way that both reflected the progress of the design process and made the maximum contribution to it. The task analysis methodology that was used for each of the five main stages of the programme is described, and this demonstrates how the task analysis approach was modified as the design process progressed. Some of the most significant generic findings and recommendations are described, and the task-specific findings have been classified to highlight the most common interface problems that were encountered</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080589509</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Centrales nucleares</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080633035</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Centros de control y recepción de alarmas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080552350</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Reactores</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080608637</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Sistema hombre-máquina</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080584771</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Diseño de sistemas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080203122</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Pendlebury, Geoff</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 38, nº 3, March 1995 ; p. 462-474</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>