A Comparison of different techniques for scaling perceived urgency

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071024527</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418121121.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">960328e19950401gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080220440</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Hellier, Elizabeth</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
      <subfield code="a">A Comparison of different techniques for scaling perceived urgency</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Elizabeth Hellier, Judy Edworthy and Ian Dennis</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This paper represents the search for a technique to measure, and to scale, perceived urgency. A single sound parameter known to have a strong influence on perceived urgency, speed is varied and subjects required to estimate its urgency. Three different methods of scaling are used on the same set of stimuli, and the cross modality matching validation for exponents is used. The experiments provide a comparison of different scaling techniques</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080552893</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Urgencias</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602574</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos de evaluación</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080562410</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Experimentos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080602567</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Métodos cuantitativos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080097202</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Edworthy, Judy</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080023058</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Dennis, Ian</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 38, nº 4, April 1995 ; p. 659-670</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>