Measuring performance in OHS : using positive performance indicators

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071030330</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418122032.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">980609s1995    aus||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">870</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080002602</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Shaw, A.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Measuring performance in OHS</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: using positive performance indicators</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">A. Shaw, V. Blewett</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">If your enterprise is like most others, the main measure you use to monitor and evaluate your performance in OHS (Occupational Health and Safety) will be Lost Time Injury Frequency Rates or other types of accident data. These outcome statistics are important data that need to be gathered and used in any workplace. Some interprises go so far as to advise shareholders about their performance in OHS according to accident data. This article review traditional approaches to OHS performance measurement and outlines a more effective approach. We see that there is both a need and a real opportunity to move away from accident data as a key performance measure</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080629724</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Seguridad e higiene en el trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080599744</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Accidentes de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080619480</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Enfermedades profesionales</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080597030</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Indice de frecuencia</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080542214</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ratios</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080020620</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Blewett, V.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Journal of occupational health and safety</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Journal of occupational health and safety</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New Zeland</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 11, 1995 ; p. 353-358</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>