Ergonomics under fire

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Dyslin, John</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2001-01-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: Nobody is happy with the ergonomic standard. Businesses see it as too intrusive, encompassing and costly. Labor is the happiest, but would like the standard to have more teeth. Medical groups while somewhat supportive, believe the standard downplays the role of the medical professional. For his part OSHA chief Charles Jeffress seems pleased the standard is done and believes it accomplishes the goals originally set forth by Labor Secretary Elisabeth Dole more than 10 years ago</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/53476.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Seguridad e higiene en el trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Lugares de trabajo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Programas de seguridad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Estados Unidos</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Ergonomics under fire</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Safety & health</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Safety & health. - Chicago. - Vol. 163, nº 1, January  2001; p. 28-33</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>