Culture, politics and ergonomics
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20071501795</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20080418122945.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">010821e20000701gbr|||| | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">875</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080109257</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Moray, Neville</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Culture, politics and ergonomics</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Neville Moray</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The beginning of a new century is an appropiate moment to consider the role of ergonomics in relation to the problems facing society. To help solve these serious global problems, ergonomics needs to be open to new disciplines, particularly those in the social sciences. Also, it may be difficult to generalize research on human-centred sociotechnical design without taking into account national characteristics, economics and political constraints. Currently there is more interest than ever in what ergonomics has to offer, but not deliver its promise requires a much broader approach than is usual. By adopting such new approaches one may help solve both the problems of the overdeveloped pos-industrial societies and those of the societies of the Third World, where a new approach to work and economics may provide an improved chance for development given the recent changes in global economics policy</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080543624</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Cultura</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080548698</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Política</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080549077</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Sociedad</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080587475</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Relaciones humanas</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080541125</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Futuro</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="d">London [etc.]</subfield>
<subfield code="g">Vol. 43 nº 7, July 2000 ; p. 858-868</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>