Questioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors
Contenido multimedia no disponible por derechos de autor o por acceso restringido. Contacte con la institución para más información.
| Tag | 1 | 2 | Valor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LDR | 00000nab a2200000 i 4500 | ||
| 001 | MAP20071501947 | ||
| 003 | MAP | ||
| 005 | 20080418123031.0 | ||
| 007 | hzruuu---uuuu | ||
| 008 | 961030e20001201gbr|||| | |00010|eng d | ||
| 040 | $aMAP$bspa | ||
| 084 | $a875 | ||
| 100 | 1 | $0MAPA20080005191$aKanis, H. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | $aQuestioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors$cH. Kanis |
| 520 | $aThis paper focuses on the analysis of deviation in findings within ergonomics-human factors research. The current terms used to address the analysis of deviation in empirical research revolve around the notion of validity. In E-HF research papers, "validity" is widely interpreted and includes its common parlance usage. The possibility is discussed that, with or without the help of these syntaxes, validation may become a method of inquiry; a productive means generating significant theoretical questions which bear directly on empirical work | ||
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080550653$aErgonomía |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080588465$aTrabajo repetitivo |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080565626$aFactor humano |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080556891$aValidación |
| 650 | 1 | 1 | $0MAPA20080607289$aMétodos experimentales |
| 740 | 0 | $aErgonomics | |
| 773 | 0 | $tErgonomics$dLondon and Washington$gVol. 45, nº 12, December 2000 ; p. 1947-1965. |