Questioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Kanis, H.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2000-12-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: This paper focuses on the analysis of deviation in findings within ergonomics-human factors research. The current terms used to address the analysis of deviation in empirical research revolve around the notion of validity. In E-HF research papers, "validity" is widely interpreted and includes its common parlance usage. The possibility is discussed that, with or without the help of these syntaxes, validation may become a method of inquiry; a productive means generating significant theoretical questions which bear directly on empirical work</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/53864.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ergonomía</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Trabajo repetitivo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Factor humano</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Validación</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos experimentales</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Questioning validity in the area of ergonomics/human factors</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Ergonomics</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Ergonomics. - London and Washington. - Vol. 45, nº 12, December 2000 ; p. 1947-1965.</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>