Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071503013</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418123605.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">021202e20000901gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">874</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080123994</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Bliss, James P.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">James P. Bliss, Mariea C. Dunn</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The article investigates the effect of increasing primary task and alarm workload on alarm mistrut as reflected by alarm and primary task performnaces. The results supported the hypotheses: increasing primary task and alarm task workload degraded alarm response performance. Also, response frequencies supported earlier research suggesting that participants probability match their response rates to alarm system reliability</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080542733</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Alarmas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080556471</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Simulacros</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080607173</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mecanismos de reacción</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080588366</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Tiempo de reacción</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586072</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Lugares de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570484</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Riesgo laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080603038</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Prevención de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080129514</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Dunn, Mariea C.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080022884</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Davis, K.G.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 43, nº 9, September 2000 ; p. 1283-1300</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>