Subjective rating scales : science or art?: target paper

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071506197</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418125003.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">041209e20021101gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800012720</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080036645</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Annett, John</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Subjective rating scales</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: science or art?: target paper</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">John Annett</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Subjective rating scales are widely used in almost every aspect of ergonomics research and practice for the assessment of workload, fatigue, usability, annoyance and comfort, and lesser known qualities such as urgency and presence, but are they truly scientific?. This paper raises some of the key issues as a basis for debate</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080544539</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Medidas</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080604721</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Análisis multivariante</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080571689</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Confortabilidad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080540999</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Fatiga</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080540951</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estrés</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570873</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajo físico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 45, nº 14, November 2002 ; p. 966-987</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>