Accommodating uncertainty in comparative risk

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Andrews, Clinton J.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Hassenzahl, David M.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Johnson, Branden B.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2004-10-01</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Comparative risk projects can provide broad policy guidance but they rarely have adequate scientific foundations to support precise risk rankings. Many extant projects report rankings anyway, with limited attention to uncertainty. The recently complete New Jersey Comparative Risk Project was innovative in trying to acknowledge and accomodate some historically ignored uncertainties in a substantive manner. This article examines the methods used and lesson learned from the New Jersey project</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/58188.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Métodos de análisis</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis comparativo</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Incertidumbre</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Simulación Monte Carlo</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Artículos y capítulos</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Accommodating uncertainty in comparative risk</dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Título: Risk analysis : an international journal</dc:title>
<dc:relation xml:lang="es">En: Risk analysis : an international journal. - New York and London. - nº 5, October 2004 ; p. 1323-1335</dc:relation>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>