Being good or being known : an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-8.xsd">
<mods version="3.8">
<titleInfo>
<title>Being good or being known</title>
<subTitle>: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080253646">
<namePart>Rindova, Violina P.</namePart>
<nameIdentifier>MAPA20080253646</nameIdentifier>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<originInfo>
<place>
<placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">usa</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="marc">2005</dateIssued>
<issuance>serial</issuance>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="marcform">print</form>
<form authority="marccategory">microform</form>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract>This study examines the extent to which organizations' reputations encompass different types of stakeholders' perceptions, which may have differential effects on economic outcomes. It proposes that reputation consists of two dimensions: the prominence in the minds of stakeholders, and the stakeholders' perceptions of an organization as able to produce quality goods. The results suggest that prominence, which derives from the choices of influential third parties vis-à-vis an organization, contributes significantly to the price premium associated with having a favorable reputation</abstract>
<note type="statement of responsibility">Violina P. Rindova... [et. al]</note>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080568863">
<topic>Estados Unidos</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080591960">
<topic>Métodos de análisis</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080605087">
<topic>Colegios profesionales</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080606176">
<topic>Excelencia empresarial</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080613815">
<topic>Diseño de organizaciones</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080588403">
<topic>Títulos académicos</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080610739">
<topic>Estructura organizativa</topic>
</subject>
<subject authority="lcshac" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="MAPA20080614027">
<topic>Evaluación de la calidad</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="">922.15</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Academy of management journal</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<publisher>New York</publisher>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="local">MAP20077100482</identifier>
<part>
<text>Vol. 48, nº 6, December 2005 ; p. 1033-1049</text>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="marcorg">MAP</recordContentSource>
<recordCreationDate encoding="marc">060310</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20080418125632.0</recordChangeDate>
<recordIdentifier source="MAP">MAP20071507742</recordIdentifier>
<languageOfCataloging>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">spa</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>