Search

Tired of Solvency II? : what boards need to do next

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20110058708</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20111006175252.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">111006e20110930esp|||p      |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">7</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20110026561</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">O'Brien, Rory</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Tired of Solvency II? </subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: what boards need to do next</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Rory O'Brien</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">You are sick of Solvency II. I wanted to use an alternative word in the title since I know that the mere sight of it will probably encourage you to bin the article before you read it. However, there is no place to hide, and failure to read the article could, in its own right, be a contravention of the Solvency II requirements! There is light at the end of the tunnel, so please read on. In Europe, a huge amount of effort and investment is being focused on Solvency II and, more globally, on enterprise risk management (ERM). Solvency II is a standing agenda item for virtually all insurance company board (boards of directors/supervisory boards) meetings, but many are asking whether the time and effort spent on this is proportionate to the value that is being created. Or is it really a distraction from the difficult job of running the business
</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080564254</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Solvencia II</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080536534</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">ERM</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080628529</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Programas de gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20100009338</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Towers Watson</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20077000932</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">Emphasis</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York : Towers Watson, 1987-</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">30/09/2011 Número 3  - 2011 , p. 32</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>