Section: ArticlesTitle: Underwriting apophenia and cryptids : are cycles statistical figments of our imagination? / M Martin Boyer, Iqbal OwadallyAuthor: Boyer, M. MartinNotes: Sumario: This paper re-examines the evidence in favour of the existence of underwriting cycles in property and casualty insurance and their economical significance. Using a meta-analysis of published papers in the area of insurance economics, we show that the evidence supporting the existence of underwriting cycles is misleading. There is, in fact, little evidence in favour of insurance cycles with a linear autoregressive character. This means that any cyclicality in firm profitability in the property and casualty insurance industry is not predictable in a classical econometric framework. It follows that pricing in the property and casualty insurance industry is not incompatible with that of a competitive market.Related records: En: Geneva papers on risk and insurance : issues and practice. - Geneva : The Geneva Association, 1976- = ISSN 1018-5895. - 06/04/2015 Volumen 40 Número 2 - abril 2015 Other categories: 2Rights: In Copyright (InC)Referencias externas:
