Measuring market and credit risk under Solvency II : evaluation of the standard technique versus internal models for stock and bond markets

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000cab a2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20220013284</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20220504120318.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">220504e20201207esp|||p      |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20220004565</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Asadi, Saeed</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Measuring market and credit risk under Solvency II</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: evaluation of the standard technique versus internal models for stock and bond markets</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Saeed Asadi, Mazin A. M. Al Janabi</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The 20082009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has swayed regulators to set forth the Solvency II agreement for determining Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) for insurance companies. In this paper, we apply novel internal models to investigate whether the latest version of the Solvency II standard model demands sufficient capital charges, both in normal and stressed times, for the different risk categories included in bond and stock portfolios. Because the GFC has shown that extreme events on the tail of probability distributions can occur quite often, our empirical findings indicate that the magnitude of the equity risk using the GJREVTCopula method requires insurers to keep more SCR for stock portfolios than the Solvency II standard model. In the case of a bond portfolio, we conclude that the Solvency II standard model requires approximately the same SCR as our internal model for the higher quality and longer maturity bonds, whereas the standard model overestimates SCR for the lower quality and shorter maturity bonds. At the same time, the standard model underestimates interest-rate risk and overestimates spread risk. Overall, the discrepancies in the estimated SCRs between the Solvency II standard technique and our internal models increase as the level of the risks rise for both stock and bond markets. Our empirical results are in line with other competing internal modeling techniques regarding stock market investment and bond portfolios with the higher quality and longer maturity bonds, while for the lower quality and shorter maturity bonds, the results contradict other modeling procedures. The obtained empirical results are interesting in terms of theory and practical applications and have important implication for compliance with the Solvency II capital requirements. Likewise, it can be of interest to insurance regulators, policymakers, actuaries, and researchers within the field of insurance and risk management.

</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080564254</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Solvencia II</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080601522</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Evaluación de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080546694</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Créditos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="w">MAP20220007085</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">07/12/2020 Número 2 - diciembre 2020 , p. 425-456</subfield>
      <subfield code="t">European Actuarial Journal</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">Cham, Switzerland  : Springer Nature Switzerland AG,  2021-2022</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>