Cybersecurity signals : connecting controls and incident outcomes

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<rdf:Description>
<dc:creator>Marsh & McLennan Companies</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Sumario: There is no shortage of controls to implement in cybersecurity. But which ones should be prioritized? Cybersecurity leaders need objective, evidence-driven metrics to help them inform and justify cybersecurity investments. In this study, we address the question of what cybersecurity measures make the biggest impact on risk, and further the conversation about control evaluation within the cybersecurity community</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>https://documentacion.fundacionmapfre.org/documentacion/publico/es/bib/188127.do</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:publisher>Marsh McLennan</dc:publisher>
<dc:rights xml:lang="es">InC - http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Ciberseguridad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Análisis de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Control</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Evaluación de riesgos</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Vulnerabilidad</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="es">Resultados</dc:subject>
<dc:type xml:lang="es">Books</dc:type>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">Cybersecurity signals : connecting controls and incident outcomes</dc:title>
<dc:format xml:lang="es">17 p.</dc:format>
<dc:description xml:lang="es">Looking back: 2023 top controls -- 2025 top controls -- Control deep dives -- Conclusion</dc:description>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>