Search

A Comparison of two methods of measuring personal noise exposure

Fichero PDF / PDF file
MARC record
Tag12Value
LDR  00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001  MAP20071017552
003  MAP
005  20080418115109.0
007  hzruuu---uuuu
008  940222s1984 gbr|||| | |00010|eng d
035  ‎$a‎6800003352
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa
084  ‎$a‎872
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080115548‎$a‎Shackleton, S.
24512‎$a‎A Comparison of two methods of measuring personal noise exposure‎$c‎S. Shackleton, M.D. Piney
520  ‎$a‎The purpose of the field research reported in this paper was to investigate the accuracy of such investigative surveys using hand-held precision integrating sounds meters. The results of five 1-day surveys are compared with repeat noise dosimetry carried out over one month for a population of engineering and foundry workers. First, however it is necessary to considerer the problems encountered when comparing the results of noise exposures measured by different measurement methods
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080539740‎$a‎Ruido
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080600488‎$a‎Contaminantes físicos
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080554040‎$a‎Dosímetros
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080569730‎$a‎Nivel de ruido
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080560973‎$a‎Valores TLV
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080591960‎$a‎Métodos de análisis
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080601492‎$a‎Estudios comparativos
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080585679‎$a‎Higiene industrial
7001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080031718‎$a‎Piney, M.D.
7404 ‎$a‎The Annals of occupational hygiene
7730 ‎$t‎The Annals of occupational hygiene‎$d‎Oxford [etc.]‎$g‎nº 4, 1984 ; p. 373-390