Search

Controversies in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL)

Fichero PDF / PDF file
MARC record
Tag12Value
LDR  00000nab a2200000 i 4500
001  MAP20071018010
003  MAP
005  20080418115254.0
007  hzruuu---uuuu
008  940314e19920401gbr|||| | |00010|eng d
035  ‎$a‎6800012632
040  ‎$a‎MAP‎$b‎spa
084  ‎$a‎872
1001 ‎$0‎MAPA20080181109‎$a‎Touma, Joseph B.
24510‎$a‎Controversies in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL)‎$c‎Joseph B. Touma
520  ‎$a‎When diagnosing and evaluating noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) for purposes of compensation, the otolaryngologist often finds himself caught between industry and unions, between management and workers. In several controversial areas, conflicting evidence is available. The following extensive review of the literature was undertaken to provide an overview of research and clarify some of the issues in this ongoing debate. The author's aim is to rule out unreliable or biased information and direct the otolaryngologist toward credible studies that can help him make a sound decision
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080585679‎$a‎Higiene industrial
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080600488‎$a‎Contaminantes físicos
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080539740‎$a‎Ruido
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080619480‎$a‎Enfermedades profesionales
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080554705‎$a‎Hipoacusia
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080597887‎$a‎Otorrinolaringología
65011‎$0‎MAPA20080576615‎$a‎Medicina laboral
7404 ‎$a‎The Annals of occupational hygiene
7730 ‎$t‎The Annals of occupational hygiene‎$d‎Oxford [etc.]‎$g‎nº 2, April 1992 ; p. 199-209