Production feedback and standards as moderators of the worker satisfaction-productivity relationship

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071020889</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120408.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">940915e19940701gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800012720</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080010324</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Das, Biman</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Production feedback and standards as moderators of the worker satisfaction-productivity relationship</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Biman Das, Anil Mital</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The moderating effects of production feedback and standards, singly or jointly, on the relationship between worker saticfaction adn productivity were investigated in a repetitive production task. the relationship between worker satisfaction and productivity can be visualized from three major perspectives: satisfaction leads to productivity, productivity leads to satisfaction, and the satisfaction-productivity relationship is moderated by a number of variables</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080598877</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Satisfacción laboral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080566968</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Productividad</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080605155</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Condiciones de trabajo</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080600389</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Comportamiento humano</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080030032</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Mital, Anil</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 37, nº 7, July 1994 ; p. 1185-1194</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>