The Evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071022455</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418120722.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">950516e19940901gbr||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">6800012720</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">875</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">The Evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">M.P. de Looze... [et al.]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">To estimate the mechanical load on the low back in manual materials handling, the Static Strength Prediction Model (SSPM, University of Michigan) is widely used in the occupational field. It requires only a small number of input variables on which basis the moment at the lumbo-sacral intervertebral joint is computed. The dynamic character of the activities is ignored in the calculations. To evaluate the validity of the SSPM in various situations, lumbar moments in lifting/lowering activities at different lifting techniques and speeds obtained by the SSPM, were compared with those obtained by a more comprehensive dynamic model</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080550653</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomía</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080570873</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Trabajo físico</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080579579</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Columna vertebral</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080557348</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Biomecánica</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080562137</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Dinamometría</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080586454</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Modelos analíticos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080096168</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">De Looze, M.P.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Ergonomics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Ergonomics</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">London and Washington</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">Vol. 37, nº 9, September 1994 ; p. 1495-1502</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>