Controlling comp costs? : 10 strategies to implement in 1997

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nab a2200000 i 4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">MAP20071029354</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20080418121933.0</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="007">hzruuu---uuuu</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">980130e19970301usa||||    | |00010|eng d</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">7</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080027957</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Kirby, Anne</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
      <subfield code="a">Controlling comp costs?</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">: 10 strategies to implement in 1997</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">by Anne Kirby</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The challenge for risk managers and workers'compensation progam administrators will be to continue to implement strategies that take advantage of these changes and not only look at managing costs but also at managing change. Here are 10 strategies that it can implement today that may a difference in 1997: take advantage of opportunities created by market consolidation; learn from states with effective managed care programs; implement state-specific programs; prevent culture clash by including claims adjusters and managed care professionals in decision making; limit the number of managed care vendors that provide service; invite outside participation in your managed care task force; understand the value-added components of your managed care provider; more is not always better; promote early intervention via automated first report of injury programs; determine management information needs before you begin</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080579722</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Control de costes</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080572396</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Indemnizaciones</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080624774</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Programa de Salud Ocupacional</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080606091</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estrategia empresarial</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="1">
      <subfield code="0">MAPA20080568863</subfield>
      <subfield code="a">Estados Unidos</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="740" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Risk management</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="t">Risk management</subfield>
      <subfield code="d">New York</subfield>
      <subfield code="g">nº 3, March 1997 ; p. 37-44</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>